Problems with Backpacking & Travel

In partnership with

Hello,

Welcome to What's The Problem, your briefing on high-value problems waiting for a solution.

This week, we turn our attention to the backpacking industry.

Backpacking & travelling is more popular than ever - but the experience is riddled with friction.

In this issue, we dive into 5 high-friction problems with backpacking & travelling — show where the biggest business opportunities lie for founders who can simplify the wild.

1. Trip Planning Overload

Problem

Independent travellers face "decision fatigue" when planning trips. The process involves synthesising information from an average of 15 different sources (TikTok, blogs, booking sites, review aggregators, maps), leading to an overwhelming and inefficient experience that often results in booking errors and suboptimal itineraries.

Why

The market has shifted towards experience-focused, multi-destination travel and away from rigid package holidays. However, the digital tools to support this trend remain fragmented. Travellers demand customisation, but the planning tools have not evolved beyond siloed booking engines and static spreadsheets.

Scale

The average traveller spends approximately 18 hours planning a single trip. This friction has a financial cost: analysis shows that 44% of travellers overspend their budget due to poor planning and last-minute decisions, representing a significant market inefficiency.

Current Solutions

• Online Travel Agents (e.g., Expedia): Offer bundled deals but lack deep customisation for complex, multi-stop itineraries.

• Spreadsheets and Docs: Highly manual, prone to human error, and disconnected from real-time data like availability or price changes.

• Human Travel Agents: Offer expertise but come at a high cost (15-20% booking fees) and are inaccessible for many budget-conscious travellers.

Opportunity

There is a clear gap for an intelligent, unified platform that automates the end-to-end planning process. An AI-powered tool could act as a personal travel curator, ingesting a user's budget, interests, and constraints to generate a complete, bookable itinerary. Integrating directly with vendor APIs would create a seamless "plan-to-book" experience, solving a major source of traveller friction.

2. Digital Nomad Infrastructure Gaps

Problem

Digital nomads, a rapidly growing demographic of location-independent professionals, constantly struggle with a core set of logistical challenges: unreliable internet connectivity, the cognitive load of managing multiple time zones, and profound social isolation.

Why

While over 60 countries have launched "nomad visas" to attract this demographic, the on-the-ground infrastructure has not kept pace. With remote work becoming a permanent fixture for many companies, the demand for a stable and supportive nomadic lifestyle is moving from a niche desire to a mainstream requirement.

Scale

The 40+ million digital nomads worldwide contribute an estimated $787 billion to the global economy. However, productivity is consistently hampered. Research indicates nomads lose an average of 11 hours per week to logistical issues, and 45% report that loneliness negatively impacts their work and well-being.

Current Solutions

• Coworking Spaces: Provide reliable internet and community but are typically expensive ($200+/month) and confined to major urban centres.

• Pocket WiFi/eSIMs: Offer connectivity but are often expensive on a per-day basis with spotty coverage in more remote locations.

• Time Zone Converters & Community Apps: Exist as separate, disconnected tools that require constant manual input and fail to offer an integrated solution.

Opportunity

The market needs a comprehensive "nomad operating system." This could be a platform or service that bundles guaranteed high-speed internet access (perhaps via partnerships with local providers or satellite services), automated calendar and workflow management based on location, and a curated community network. A subscription-based ecosystem providing these core pillars would be an indispensable tool for this high-value demographic.

3. Inefficient Packing

Problem

Backpackers, particularly novices, consistently overpack. Carrying excessive or poorly distributed weight is the leading cause of on-trail discomfort and injury, including chronic back pain, joint strain, and blisters. This physical toll frequently leads to trip abandonment.

Why

The rise of social media has created "gear FOMO" (fear of missing out), encouraging the purchase and packing of non-essential items. While ultralight equipment exists, its high cost and the expert knowledge required to use it effectively make it inaccessible to the mainstream market. This creates a dangerous gap where enthusiasm outpaces experience.

Scale

Nearly half (48%) of long-distance hikers report a pack-related injury during their trip, with 22% abandoning their journey early as a direct result. The average medical cost for treating a moderate hiking injury is over $2,500, not including the cost of trip interruption.

Current Solutions

• Static Packing Lists: Generic checklists found online that fail to account for individual trip duration, climate, terrain, or personal physiology.

• Manual Luggage Scales: A reactive tool that confirms a pack is too heavy but offers no guidance on what to remove or how to optimise the load.

• Professional Consultations: Effective but expensive ($100+/hour) and inaccessible to the average backpacker.

Opportunity

A dynamic packing assistant could solve this problem at scale. A tool could generate a personalised, optimised gear list based on user inputs (destination, duration, fitness level, existing gear). The next evolution would be a "smart pack" system with integrated sensors that provides real-time feedback on weight distribution and posture, actively helping to prevent injury before it occurs.

4. Outdated Travel Insurance Claims

Problem

The process for filing a travel insurance claim is archaic and adversarial. Travellers are burdened with complex paperwork, manual evidence collection, and long, opaque review periods. This friction leads to high rejection rates for minor errors and causes many to abandon valid claims altogether.

Why

The frequency of travel disruptions is increasing. A 300% rise in extreme weather events since 2020 has caused a spike in flight cancellations and other insurable incidents, overwhelming legacy insurance providers who still rely on manual processing. Customer expectations, shaped by seamless fintech experiences, are no longer aligned with this slow, paper-based reality.

Scale

The average claims process takes 22 days. Nearly 30% of claims are initially rejected due to documentation errors. The result is a broken system where an estimated $4.8 billion in valid claims are abandoned annually by frustrated customers.

Current Solutions

• Traditional Insurers: Rely on paper or PDF forms, manual review, and slow bank transfers, creating a frustrating user experience.

• App-Based Insurtechs (e.g., Lemonade): Have successfully automated claims in other verticals (e.g., renters insurance) but have limited offerings and penetration in the complex travel sector.

• Travel Agent Assistance: Agents can help with claims but typically charge a premium service fee or a percentage of the payout.

Opportunity

An "insurtech" solution built for travel could automate the entire claims lifecycle. By integrating with travel data (flight APIs, hotel booking systems, GPS location data), a tool could pre-fill claim forms and automatically verify qualifying events (e.g., a flight delay exceeding 3 hours). Using AI to parse receipts and documents could enable instant adjudication and payout for common claims, creating immense value for both the traveller and the underwriter.

5. Critical Navigation Failures in Remote Areas

Problem

Hikers are increasingly reliant on mobile applications for navigation in the wilderness, but these tools have critical failure points. Crowdsourced trail data is often inaccurate or outdated, and app features like offline maps frequently fail when they are needed most, leaving users dangerously disoriented without a mobile signal.

Why

Search and Rescue (SAR) data shows that 45% of incidents now involve hikers who became lost while relying solely on a smartphone app. Concurrently, public land agencies face budget cuts, reducing their capacity for trail maintenance and ranger patrols, which further increases the risk to the public.

Scale

In the US alone, National Parks conduct over 3,400 SAR operations annually, with an average cost to the taxpayer of $895 per person rescued. Getting lost is the leading cause of these incidents. AllTrails, a leading app, has documented failure rates of 27% for its offline map download feature. This is not a minor inconvenience; it's a life-threatening flaw.

Current Solutions

• Dedicated GPS Devices (e.g., Garmin): Highly reliable but expensive ($300+ hardware) and require a paid subscription, creating a high barrier to entry.

• Paper Maps & Compass: The gold standard for safety, but the skills required to use them effectively are diminishing.

• Consumer Hiking Apps (e.g., AllTrails): Suffer from unreliable crowdsourced data, buggy offline modes, and significant battery drain.

Opportunity

The market needs a "fail-safe" digital navigation tool built with a safety-first principle. The solution would involve professionally verified trail data instead of unvetted crowdsourced content. The core opportunity lies in developing a truly robust offline mode that is rigorously tested and guaranteed to work. Advanced features could include AI-powered terrain analysis for re-routing and integration with emerging satellite-to-phone communication technologies for emergency messaging.